The truth, and reason, behind the NASA fake Apollo Moon missions.

When testing the feasibility of humans in space, tests were first conducted using animals. No animal however was used to test a return Moon journey.
If a Moon landing was possible, in reality it was not, then surely it would make logical sense to send the astronaut who had the most space experience on the first Moon mission. Someone who had experienced long duration of weightlessness in Earth orbit. Apollo 11 was Armstrong's second and final space mission, which of course was in low Earth orbit.
When mankind ventures into new, unknown territory, with great risks attached, the first person who makes that journey would, in all sense and reason, accompany the second person, or persons, on a return journey for guidance, and essential procedures to prevent any mishaps occurring. Neither Armstrong, Aldrin, or any other Apollo astronaut for that matter accompanied fresh astronauts on that new journey. It is astonishing that all missions managed to land safely and take off again without a hitch, but they never got anywhere near to the Moon, which would of course explain why this was so.
Astronauts with the most space experience should be first in line for any round trip to the Moon, being a return journey of 500,000 miles. However for many of the Apollo astronauts, the alleged Moon landing was their FIRST AND ONLY space mission, which seems somewhat odd. Those first timers were also manning the communication consoles at mission control during other Apollo missions. There were in fact TWO communication links on all Apollo missions.
The first was Launch Control, who communicated with the astronauts from the moment of launch, up until they were in Earth orbit. Once in Earth orbit, communication to the astronauts was transferred to those "limited few in the know" who were manning Mission Control. They had to do it this way so that Launch Control would not wise up to the fact that they were not going to Moon at all. For what other reason would they have two separate communication links, and why is this practice not operated today?
In 1968 NASA Chief Astronaut, Deke Slayton, (one of the main perpetrators of faking Apollo), visited the film set of "2001 Space Odyssey", in the UK He referred to it as NASA East, and it was here that he got the idea for filming the mock lunar module, and command module separation and docking. Film of the alleged booster stage falling away from module was also sequenced on Kubrick's film set. Think about it, how could you install a camera in the center part of a rocket booster engine without it being burned to a crisp?
It can only be done on a film set, and why is it we only see this sequence, albeit repeated for each Apollo mission, only on the Moon missions, and not on any other space mission? TV pictures allegedly beamed back to Earth showing lunar module separation, were razor sharp colour images, why therefore were the TV transmissions from the Moon grey and fuzzy, after all they were supposedly transmitted across the same distance in space?
In the book "One  Small Step" by Tim Furniss, there are numerous references to mechanical, electrical, and other failures in almost every Gemini and Apollo mission. It's unbelievable that the USA even got into space at all, let alone to the Moon and back, which of course they did not. Many of NASA's space problems, and failures, continued long after the Apollo program, and still continue to this day. If NASA could achieve such amazing feats over 55 years ago, then space technology has gone back, instead of forward.
In the 1980s, at the height of the Reagan's Star Wars program, a shuttle was launched into space , and it's on board computer was programmed to "lock on" to a laser beam projected from the top of a 2,000 foot high mountain somewhere in the states. Unfortunately all distance measurements programmed into the shuttle's computer were registered as miles, consequently the "lock on" device aboard the shuttle began scanning the globe searching for a 2,000 mile high mountain. Unable to locate one, the shuttle turned on it's back, and began scanning outer space to search for the immortal 2,000 mile high mountain.
In the 90s, an American shuttle due to dock with the Mir space station, had a fuel leak, and was spraying out fuel as it approached Mir. Russia refused the shuttle to come anywhere Mir, until the leak had been repaired, in case the spewing fuel damaged the stations sensitive solar panels. Following the collapse of Communism in 1989, NASA scientists were allowed full access to Russia's space program and technology, which under Communism was highly top secret technology. What NASA scientists discovered shocked them. Russia had perfected a rocket engine which was 20 years ahead of anything that NASA had at the time. This only reinforces the fact that Russia were way ahead of the USA in space technology, and always have been. Even today NASA has to continually rely on Russian rockets to deliver cargo to the International Space Station because of ongoing problems, and final demise, of their shuttle.
Admittedly Russia has had the occasional problem/failure, however their problem/failure rate is substantially lower than that of the USA. Russia was of course the first in space with Sputnik, an animal, a man, a woman, a space walk, and finally a space station. They were the first in everything to do with space. The USA were paranoid at the Soviet successes in space, as it could not be seen that a Communist country was leading the world in this new-found technology.
It was after Shepherd's 15-minute sub orbital "space hop", that JFK made his now infamous speech that America should commit itself to landing a man on the Moon, and returning him safely to Earth, within 8 years. A bold, brash, and somewhat ridiculous statement to make following a 15-minute space hop a mere 69 miles above Earth, after all the Moon was over 250,000 miles away. Scientists knew there and then that it was an impossibility, but Kennedy had said it, and the USA would face ridicule if they could not achieve it.
A short while after Kennedy's speech, NASA realized that a Moon landing was totally impossible within 8 years. Top NASA officials met in secret, and decided the only option was to fake the Moon landing in 1969, in the hope that they would get there shortly after, whereby they could shroud the earlier faked missions with genuine Moon photographs and film. The truth is getting to the Moon and back is many, many years into the future.
Many point to President Richard Nixon as the main culprit behind the biggest lie ever inflicted on society. This however is incorrect because the ideas and planning which went into faking the Moon missions began in the early 60s, following Kennedy's now infamous speech to Congress. It was therefore President L B Johnson who had the most inside knowledge and plans to fake the Moon mission, and it was he who made the Apollo material classified, with a declassification date of 2026. Nixon took office shortly before Apollo 11, but continued the lies under guidance from the CIA in order to boost American morale, which was at an all time low. Every US President from Lyndon Johnson up to Joe Biden, are, or were, fully aware that the Moon missions were faked, but the CIA have the upper hand when it comes to American security, and pride of place in space technology.
Getting to the Moon and back is, of course, a long way into the future, and could not be achieved today, even with a joint international effort to share the cost. NASA faked Apollo so as not to face ridicule over JFK's speech, to instil pride in the American people, and to convince western civilization that they were better than the USSR in space technology, when in reality they were not. Now, after 55 years, they are making themselves a worldwide laughing-stock with ridiculous pictures on their Apollo websites. One does not have to be a photographic expert to spot that the pictures are 100% fake.
NASA's feeble excuse for not returning to the Moon is because they cannot afford it. The Apollo program allegedly cost $25 billion, at a time when the USA was heavily involved in the Vietnam war, that alone cost them $250 billion, 10 times the cost of Apollo. They have not been involved in anything as big as Vietnam since, so why this feeble excuse, when technology has increased four thousand fold since 1969? If NASA's Moon landings were genuine, then getting to the Moon and back should be far easier today than what it was back in 1968. It would cost the same, or much less than what Apollo cost, because the technology, ie, tried and tested methods, along with drawings and equipment etc., has apparently already been done. The reason they cannot return to the Moon, is because they never went there in the first place. One cannot return to a place one has never visited.
In 1980, long time sceptic of the Apollo Moon missions, Bill Kaysing appeared on the Oprah Winfrey show, detailing how NASA had conned the American people into believing that they had landed men on the Moon. A national survey at the time by the program makers showed a staggering 60% of Americans believed the Moon landings were faked. We have moved on a further 44 years, and still there are those who believe NASA lies.
Bill Kaysing had offered to appear on a live TV debate with any of the Apollo astronauts, NASA officials, or even the lot of them together, verses him on his own, to answer questions, and debate the authenticity of Apollo. Think about this, if these astronauts had indeed been to the Moon, and NASA truly landed men on the Moon as they claim, then they had absolutely nothing to fear, and could have demolished Kaysing's theory in less than 5 minutes. Not only that, but they would  have made him look ridiculous in front of millions of people. However both astronauts and NASA continually declined for any such meeting/debate on television.
That just about sums it up in a nutshell, they could not answer his questions. Bill Kaysing has now passed away, however he did accuse NASA of murdering the 3 astronauts in the Apollo 1 fire because they would not go along with any faking of Moon missions. This was a very libellous statement to make if it were untrue. Did NASA taken any legal action to sue Kaysing for labelling them as murderers? No of course not because (A) The statement may be true, (B) If it were not true, any legal action would bring into question the authenticity of the alleged Moon landings, and that is something that NASA did not want.
The TV series "From the Earth to the Moon", showed just how easy it was to create a Moon landscape, as well as simulated gravity. The film was identical in every way to the original Apollo films, and yet this series was filmed in a TV studio. The film makers even used the same scene from the faked Apollo 17 pictures, and even used the same Moon buggy, which NASA claim was left on the Moon.
There are many, many visual signs in the photographs and film, which point to the fact that they are not genuine. Likewise there are many irregularities in the alleged Moon mission data, statements made describing each mission, and comments made by the astronauts. Scientific evidence, namely deadly radiation, also proves that they could not have landed on the Moon, and returned safely to Earth.
It is not mankind's greatest achievement as we were told back in 69, but possibly the biggest scam, fraud, con, hoax, call it what you like of the last century. NASA refuse to answer any questions regarding Apollo, and likewise the astronauts are reluctant to talk about their alleged Moon missions. This is shown in the acknowledgments section of the book "One Small Step" a fictional/fantasy book written by Tim Furniss.
You can tell by Armstrong's actions, and the look on his face during pre-launch interview, that he knows he is not going anywhere near the Moon, and has been forced to tell lies in front of millions of people. He is nervous, stumbles over his words, and looks down at the table in front of him like some little boy who has been told off by his teacher. This was to hide his guilt from the camera, hardly the behaviour of a man about to make history. The guilt is also clearly visible on the faces of all three astronauts whilst in the quarantine chamber aboard Hornet. All three struggle to raise a smile, but are unable to keep it up. Their faces quickly return to a sullen look as if to say "We should not be conning the American people in this way".
There is an old saying that "A liar needs a good memory". Nowhere is this more true than in the Apollo program. NASA tell lies to cover up previous lies, and other discrepancies uncovered by people investigating the Moon landings. Altering previous data, removing photographs, and retracting statements made, only reinforces the evidence that NASA are on the run, and being forced into a corner to which they cannot escape. The actions of those under investigation makes the investigator more aware they are bluffing. The longer that person, or persons, who make the extravagant claims continue, the more lies they have to tell in order to counteract it, until it reaches the point where it becomes ridiculous. That point was passed in July 1999, when NASA officials were questioned about the Moon landings on television. They dodged the all important questions like a drifter dodges the heat.
Many Apollo astronauts have long since died, as to have many of the original NASA officials involved in the scam. Now current NASA officials, who know that Apollo was a fake, have not quite got it right when talking openly in public. Perhaps the biggest slip of the tongue was made by NASA Chief Dan Goldin when interviewed by UK TV journalist Sheena McDonald in 1994. He said that mankind cannot venture beyond Earth orbit, 250 miles into space, until they can find a way to overcome the dangers of cosmic radiation. He must have forgotten that they sent 27 astronauts 250,000 miles outside Earth orbit 26 years earlier.
During the 60s and 70s, many Third World countries were drifting towards Communism, and the USA regarded any increase in Communism, no matter how small, as a direct threat to their democracy. The USA, under the guidance of the CIA, would pull out all the stops, and do practically anything, to halt this sway towards Communism, no matter how bizarre a plan was put forward. At this time Russia was, and still are, way ahead of the USA in space technology. The CIA assumed that those countries drifting towards Communism were impressed with the Soviet space success rate, when in reality they were simply ridding their countries of corrupt democratic governments.
The CIA also surmised that working class people in the countries moving towards Communism were of low intelligence, and therefore gullible enough to believe anything. Again this is untrue, as Cuban schools have, since 1969, always taught the Apollo Moon landings as fake. If the USA could impress the world with a super human technological feat, it may turn the tide, and convince those countries that a democracy like the USA was the way forward, and, at the same time instil pride in the American people.
NASA were under orders from the CIA to fake the Moon landings as a propaganda tool for US government. The Apollo farce was an extension of the MKULTRA mind control experiments in the 50s and 60s. This is proven by naming the program “Project Apollo” All programs under MKULTRA were prefixed with the word Project. The “powers that be” inside the USA, namely the CIA, were paranoid that the USA may experience an uprising like Russia did in 1917, leading to a Communist US. That's why Communism was banned in the US.
How could we, (the CIA), control the masses so that they do not rebel against their own country? Keep them calm, content, and pacified, (that's what the hippie drugs did in the 1960s, another CIA tactic). But most of all, how could we instil pride in all American citizens, and give them a "feel good factor" that would last for many years? The idea gained momentum in the mid to late 60s, due to the Black Panther Movement, resentment at America's involvement in Vietnam, and general unrest.
It was time for the CIA to test another weapon in the use of mind control on unsuspecting Americans. They opted to use TV as a brainwashing tool, because most homes now had television. Americans deeply wanted a USA citizen to be first on the Moon. It is said that if people want something to happen badly, and they see film of that event happening, then they would truly believe it.
And that's exactly what the CIA did, used television as a brainwashing/mind control device to control the masses, make them believe the USA had achieved an amazing feat to pacify, and keep them in deep slumber and contempt by showing them propaganda films of a Moon landing. This would then instil extreme pride into Americans, like a “Feel good, proud to be American” factor that would last for many years to come, and hopefully remove any thoughts of rebelling. Problem with this type of mind control is that only the gullible are affected, and then, after many years, they are left with psychological brain damage.

This is because they cannot comprehend that what they thought was America's greatest achievement, was in fact a gigantic lie. Those with basic common sense, (like the author of this article), were not taken in by the scam at the time because everything happened “too quickly”, and the film and video looked “too tacky” to be genuine. The Apollo 8 Earthrise picture was enough to convince the author that the picture was fake, and what we were witnessing was nothing more than blatant lies from NASA.
Now you know why CIA director Richard Helms, had the MKULTRA files destroyed in 1973, immediately after Apollo finished. Anyone who was around during the mid to late 60s would know that references to brainwashing and mind control were becoming quite the norm with TV programs like “The Prisoner” and films such as “Clockwork Orange” and “The Ipcress Files”. I think if most Americans knew what the CIA had been up to since WW2, they would rebel against their country anyway. Richard Helms said immediately after destroying the MKULTRA files “We can create false memories now” That is certainly true for those who still believe in the Moon landings.
The Western world is again going through a phase of civil unrest, unfortunately NASA/CIA cannot fake a manned Mars landing so easily, so they settle for fake Mars probes/landers. This will hopefully keep US citizens in deep slumber and contempt by showing them propaganda films of Curiosity Rover roaming around the Arizona desert. Once you tell a big lie and cover up, you have to continue with it, no matter how ridiculous the saga becomes. That is why NASA are now making themselves a worldwide laughing stock.
It was of course a pathetic move by the CIA, who were ill-informed at the time, and did not consider the future implications, because they now cannot find a way to follow on from Apollo. When questioned why no Moon missions have taken place since Apollo, NASA make feeble excuses that they cannot afford it. The real truth of the matter is that they do not have the technology to accomplish such a feat in the year 2024, and certainly would not have had it back in 1968, when NASA told us that Apollo 8 was bound for the Moon.
In addition to creating a "Feel good, proud to be American" factor into US citizens, there was also a more sinister motive taking place. If the US government showed a film of some event, which they claim was true, but was not, and the American people fully accepted it as being true, then it opened the floodgates for the US government to feed Western society a load of lies and untruths about their enemies via TV news media. This would then gain them public support for their own agenda.
The USA wanted to appear the "good guys", and their enemies the "bad guys", but in reality it has created the opposite effect, and will eventually lead to the downfall of the USA. With Apollo, they had in fact laid the foundation stone in using television as a brainwashing tool to spread "Fake News" within Western society. No one needs reminding of the amount of fake news we hear about today. The so called Syrian gas attack which gave the USA an excuse to target the Syrian army, is a classic example. So now you know when, and where, fake news started, and the reasons behind it.
This can be best summed up in a comment made by CIA Director William Casey back in 1981 under the Reagan administration. He said, and I quote, "We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981).

American citizens need to wake up from their brainwashed coma, and realise how the USA government is controlling them like they were zombies.
The most baffling aspect of all this, is how astronauts like Armstrong and Aldrin could have been led astray by such a scenario. Both are highly trained fighter/test pilots, and could not therefore be classed as dumbo's, moreover highly intelligent personnel, with a highly skilled job. How could they possibly go along with such a scam, which would undoubtedly be exposed in later years? Many believe they, and the other astronauts, were influenced by mind-expanding drugs, which were extremely common about this time, or, it could be that they to were under some form of mind control by the CIA.
This may be true as Buzz Aldrin has suffered mental illness from psychological brain damage. The only real way to find out would be to speak to all of the astronauts, and of course this is impossible. After the fake Moon landings,  Armstrong and other Apollo astronauts, had strict instructions not to discuss the authenticity of the Moon landings with any reporter, or investigative journalist.
Pro Apollo Nutters

PAN stands for Pro Apollo Nutter. The name is applied to those idiots who will not, under any circumstances, despite overwhelming evidence, accept the fact the Apollo Moon landings were faked. They will go to great lengths to keep the Apollo fairy story alive, and lecture others that the Moon missions really did take place 55 years ago. Unfortunately they do not realise just how ridiculous, and stupid they make themselves look in their so called debunking claims. In fact they have not debunked one single anomaly in the Apollo fairy story.

Many PANs are on the NASA payroll, but those that are not connected to NASA in any way, are clearly "removed from reality".
The ever-increasing evidence, exposed by NASASCAM, and other Moon hoax sites, has caused NASA, and PANs, to get a bit hot under the collar. Why? Because they know that what appears on the NASASCAM site, and its relevant links, is in fact the truth. NASA have been forced into a corner into which there is no escape. Pro Apollo Nutters are scared and angry that their lifelong fantasy is under such intense investigation, and being pulled apart piece by piece. When those pieces of the NASASCAM are closely re-assembled, it becomes plainly obvious to anyone what NASA did back in the 60s, and why they did it.
Here are a few examples. The link I made to picture 1 on home page, was broken in Jan 2003. The picture was removed from the official NASA site to save embarrassment, but which then disrupted my link. However I have made a fresh link to another source of the picture, which includes Tuttle's name at the bottom. Conclusive proof that it was Tuttle who faked the Internet pictures for NASA sometime in the mid 1990s.
One stupid PAN claimed it was impossible Tuttle could have faked the pictures, as he was only 5 years old at the time of Apollo 11. This just goes to show what numbskulls they really are. Evidently he cannot read, because on the APOLLO FAKE site it clearly states exactly when the MAJORITY OF NASA MOON PICTURES WERE CREATED. That is the mid 90s, when Tuttle was in his thirties, and NOT 5 years old as the moronic PAN claimed. Conclusive proof that PANs, unlike the author of this site, do not research the subject in detail.
Another PAN was angry and concerned about Arthur Clarke's "Hole in History" remark, and suggested Clarke should sue me for defamation. Further proof that PANs do not read, or research the subject. The remark made by Clarke appears in the book "Dark Moon". Evidently this particular PAN has not read the book. Either Clarke made the remark, or he did not. If he did not make that remark then he should sue the author/publisher of "Dark Moon" and not me. Clarke was of course heavily involved in the faking of the Apollo Moon missions, but do you think he will honestly admit it? No of course not, but try telling that to a PAN. It's pretty pointless really as they prefer to live with the fantasy that men really did journey to the Moon and back.
Another PAN queried how I knew Armstrong had no memoranda whatsoever from his alleged Moon mission. That statement appears in the book "One Small Step", a fictional/fantasy book written purely for PANs, but none appear to know about it, let alone to have read the book.
Many PANs claim that info on the APOLLO DATA website is incorrect. Once again it CLEARLY STATES AT TOP OF WEB PAGE WHERE THE INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM. If the information is incorrect, then the two books mentioned are also incorrect. It is clear evidence that PANs do not research the subject, or read any books on the alleged Moon missions. In practice, they have no case whatsoever.
Finally, one PAN, who found my site "scary", contacted Tuttle to ask why his website had a link too my APOLLO FAKE website, and if he did not fake the pictures for NASA, why he did not take legal action to get his name and link removed. Tuttle can't take legal action because he knows full well that what appears on the APOLLO FAKE website is in fact 100% true, and there is ample evidence to support it.
The PAN also put questions to Tuttle. Tuttle refused to answer his questions, and told the PAN not to contact him any more, as he, (Tuttle), was not bothered by the website. Think about this. If someone wrote an article accusing you of doing something you had not done, then you would take immediate steps to get it removed. IF, on the other hand, the statements were correct, then you would keep mum, say nothing about it, and hope it just fades away. If Tuttle refused to answer his questions, and told the PAN not to contact him any more, does that not sound familiar?
We've seen it with so many of those involved in the Apollo missions. In other words they know that what appears on the website is in fact the truth, but do not wish to discuss the issue for obvious reasons. However they cannot do much about statements which are wholly truthful. Those involved in the fake Moon missions must get pretty fed up with PANs who e-mail them with questions to counteract any suggestion the Moon missions were faked. They will not answer any questions whether you are pro, or anti hoax. This, of course, only reinforces their guilt inasmuch as they have plenty to hide.
You only have to look at the PAN forum on the Badastronomy and other Apollohoax sites too see what complete lunatics these people are. They claim to have debunked any evidence that the Moon missions were faked, when in reality their debunking claims are even more ridiculous and absurd than the fake pictures. They spend all their time posting gibberish nonsense to each other. This gibberish nonsense is typical of the sort of nonsense that emanates from an inpatient within a psychiatric unit. Their postings do not make any sense at all to a normal human being.
What PANs really need is medication to correct an imbalance within their minds, an imbalance which results in disorientated thoughts and delusions. Such medication is available which would return their thoughts/thinking more closely in tune with reality, and the majority media. They can then sit back, read, and study in great depth the truth behind Apollo. Once they get the clear picture, they will feel such gullible fools for believing that NASA sent men on Moon missions over 55 years ago.
If PANs still cannot accept the fact that NASA lied to the world about landing on the Moon, then all I can say to them is "You can have your FAKE, and eat it to, as the majority are not convinced". So in other words DO NOT try and force the Apollo fairy story onto those of us who know the full facts behind Apollo. The author of this site has studied the Apollo program since the mid 60's, and is therefore in a better position than your average PAN too state whether the moon missions were real or fake.
Start your investigation here.
Read what the media say about naughty NASA.
Facts to be considered about Apollo, plus a Q & A section.
How, and where, NASA faked the lunar orbiting, landing, and lift off videos.
USGS involvement in the faking of Apollo Moon missions.
The person responsible for NASA's fake Moon pictures.
How space radiation makes Moon trip impossible.
Misleading data regarding the Apollo missions.
More of NASA's fake Moon pictures, with added humour.
You've just gotta take the mickey.
Clear cut evidence of fakery in the Apollo Moon videos.